Connect with us

Technology

Five Pointers for Creating a Moral Generic AI Policy

Published

on

Five Pointers for Creating a Moral Generic AI Policy

For marketers, generative AI has emerged as a crucial tool for content generation. Although playing with the tool and seeing how quickly it can produce seemingly intelligent outputs is entertaining, responsible use of the technology is crucial.

However, how can we set boundaries and encourage artistic experimentation at the same time?

As cliché as it may sound, the solution is to draft a thorough generative AI policy.

Here are five doable measures to take into account when drafting such a policy and how to use it successfully throughout the company.

Describe important terminology

Don’t presume that everyone understands the jargon of generative AI. Employee miscommunication and divergent definitions are eliminated when there is agreement on a common language.

Input, output, generative AI, generative AI tool, and generative AI-assisted content are important terms. and the list goes on. These definitions will need to be updated and expanded upon throughout time in light of the changing environment.

Establish an unambiguous list of dos and don’ts

The greatest way to simplify difficult ethical concepts is to compile a useful list of appropriate conduct.

Though it is the cornerstone of the generative AI policy, this list is frequently presented as an appendix.

Employees can respect intellectual property rights pertaining to text, images, sound, and video that they obtain from third parties by adhering to a set of dos and don’ts.

As an illustration:

Don’t include proprietary, sensitive, or confidential information about your business or your clients in the training data or input.

Never utilize input or prompts to copy previously completed work.

Don’t provide any personally identifiable information.

Don’t use any generative AI technology without consulting a human.

Make sure you maintain thorough records of all the inputs, outputs, licenses, and rights for your data.

Be upfront about the fact that a piece of content was produced by a generative AI tool.

Express agreement regarding the usage of tools

It is crucial to specify precisely which tools are authorized for use across the entire organization and to let every employee know about this.

Some businesses choose not to offer their general clearance for the use of generative AI tools. When a member of the team wishes to utilize a tool, the steering committee or clearance process is consulted. This is a cumbersome and slow process.

You don’t want to discourage experimentation and creative thinking. It is preferable to promote play, but only within well-established moral and legal bounds.

If you decide to use the green-listing method, provide brief justifications for each tool’s approval or disapproval. For instance, “We would not own any of the inputs or outputs, which is why this tool is on the red list.” Alternatively, “This tool lacks terms and conditions, which is why it is on the red list.”

Clearly state your ethical principles

Since generative AI tools are still in their infancy, there are legitimate questions concerning the methods by which they are employed and educated. Your policy should make the company’s moral compass very apparent.

As an illustration:

Don’t utilize the output to produce deceptive, false, unfair, or damaging content.

Choose and employ inputs that steer clear of dangerous, offensive, and discriminating information.

Observe privacy laws and defend people’s rights.

Define supervision and management

Indicate who in the company will be in charge of managing your generative AI green list and the implementation of authorized tools, who will be in charge of examining prospective new and upcoming features and tools, and who will be in charge of responding to incident reports and legal inquiries. Share this information broadly and concisely.

To get you started, these are just five of the fundamentals. However, keep in mind that your policy is a living document. Since generative AI is a dynamic field, the policy will also need to adapt, requiring regular evaluations and revisions.

Everyone in the team should receive training on the policy and have access to it via a corporate site as soon as it’s ready. Training should pay special attention to any green and red lists as well as the dos and don’ts.

Not to mention, always be receptive to input from your teams. Your generative AI policy will benefit from a variety of perspectives, just as a training set for generative AI must have a wide range of sources in order to be effective.

Technology

Threads uses a more sophisticated search to compete with Bluesky

Published

on

Instagram Threads, a rival to Meta’s X, will have an enhanced search experience, the firm said Monday. The app, which is based on Instagram’s social graph and provides a Meta-run substitute for Elon Musk’s X, is introducing a new feature that lets users search for certain posts by date ranges and user profiles.

Compared to X’s advanced search, which now allows users to refine queries by language, keywords, exact phrases, excluded terms, hashtags, and more, this is less thorough. However, it does make it simpler for users of Threads to find particular messages. Additionally, it will make Threads’ search more comparable to Bluesky’s, which also lets users use sophisticated queries to restrict searches by user profiles, date ranges, and other criteria. However, not all of the filtering options are yet visible in the Bluesky app’s user interface.

In order to counter the danger posed by social networking startup Bluesky, which has quickly gained traction as another X competitor, Meta has started launching new features in quick succession in recent days. Bluesky had more than 9 million users in September, but in the weeks after the U.S. elections, users left X due to Elon Musk’s political views and other policy changes, including plans to alter the way blocks operate and let AI companies train on X user data. According to Bluesky, there are currently around 24 million users.

Meta’s Threads introduced new features to counter Bluesky’s potential, such as an improved algorithm, a design modification that makes switching between feeds easier, and the option for users to select their own default feed. Additionally, it was observed creating Starter Packs, its own version of Bluesky’s user-curated recommendation lists.

Continue Reading

Technology

Apple’s own 5G modem-equipped iPhone SE 4 is “confirmed” to launch in March

Published

on

Tom O’Malley, an analyst at Barclays, recently visited Asia with his colleagues to speak with suppliers and makers of electronics. The analysts said they had “confirmed” that a fourth-generation iPhone SE with an Apple-designed 5G modem is scheduled to launch near the end of the first quarter next year in a research note they released this week that outlines the main conclusions from the trip. That timeline implies that the next iPhone SE will be unveiled in March, similar to when the present model was unveiled in 2022, in keeping with earlier rumors.

The rumored features of the fourth-generation iPhone SE include a 6.1-inch OLED display, Face ID, a newer A-series chip, a USB-C port, a single 48-megapixel rear camera, 8GB of RAM to enable Apple Intelligence support, and the previously mentioned Apple-designed 5G modem. The SE is anticipated to have a similar design to the base iPhone 14.

Since 2018, Apple is said to have been developing its own 5G modem for iPhones, a move that will let it lessen and eventually do away with its reliance on Qualcomm. With Qualcomm’s 5G modem supply arrangement for iPhone launches extended through 2026 earlier this year, Apple still has plenty of time to finish switching to its own modem. In addition to the fourth-generation iPhone SE, Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo earlier stated that the so-called “iPhone 17 Air” would come with a 5G modem that was created by Apple.

Whether Apple’s initial 5G modem would offer any advantages to consumers over Qualcomm’s modems, such quicker speeds, is uncertain.

Qualcomm was sued by Apple in 2017 for anticompetitive behavior and $1 billion in unpaid royalties. In 2019, Apple purchased the majority of Intel’s smartphone modem business after the two firms reached a settlement in the dispute. Apple was able to support its development by acquiring a portfolio of patents relating to cellular technology. It appears that we will eventually be able to enjoy the results of our effort in four more months.

On March 8, 2022, Apple made the announcement of the third-generation iPhone SE online. With antiquated features like a Touch ID button, a Lightning port, and large bezels surrounding the screen, the handset resembles the iPhone 8. The iPhone SE presently retails for $429 in the United States, but the new model may see a price increase of at least a little.

Continue Reading

Technology

Google is said to be discontinuing the Pixel Tablet 2 and may be leaving the market once more

Published

on

Google terminated the development of the Pixel Tablet 3 yesterday, according to Android Headlines, even before a second-generation model was announced. The second-generation Pixel Tablet has actually been canceled, according to the report. This means that the gadget that was released last year will likely be a one-off, and Google is abandoning the tablet market for the second time in just over five years.

If accurate, the report indicates that Google has determined that it is not worth investing more money in a follow-up because of the dismal sales of the Pixel Tablet. Rumors of a keyboard accessory and more functionality for the now-defunct project surfaced as recently as last week.

It’s important to keep in mind that Google’s Nest subsidiary may abandon its plans for large-screen products in favor of developing technologies like the Nest Hub and Hub Max rather than standalone tablets.

Google has always had difficulty making a significant impact in the tablet market and creating a competitor that can match Apple’s iPad in terms of sales and general performance, not helped in the least by its inconsistent approach. Even though the hardware was good, it never really fought back after getting off to a promising start with the Nexus 7 eons ago. Another problem that has hampered Google’s efforts is that Android significantly trails iPadOS in terms of the quantity of third-party apps that are tablet-optimized.

After the Pixel Slate received tremendously unfavorable reviews, the firm first declared that it was finished producing tablets in 2019. Two tablets that were still in development at the time were discarded.

By 2022, however, Google had altered its mind and declared that a tablet was being developed by its Pixel hardware team. The $499 Pixel Tablet was the final version of the gadget, which came with a speaker dock that the tablet could magnetically connect to. (Google would subsequently charge $399 for the tablet alone.)

Continue Reading

Trending

error: Content is protected !!