Connect with us

Health

A Blood Test for Alzheimer’s Detects 90% of Early Dementia Cases, Study Reveals

Published

on

A recent study indicated that a combined blood test for cognitive decline may accurately identify 90% of cases of memory loss as being caused by Alzheimer’s disease.

By contrast, 73% of cases diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease by neurologists and other memory specialists were accurately diagnosed. The study found that primary care physicians performed even worse, with an accuracy rate of just 61%.

One component of the blood test, known as plasma phosphorylated tau 217, or p-tau217 for short, is being studied by scientists as one of numerous blood biomarkers for the identification of Alzheimer’s disease at an early stage and mild cognitive impairment.

The test quantifies tau protein 217, a highly reliable marker of amyloid disease, according to study coauthor Dr. Sebastian Palmqvist, a senior consultant neurologist at Lund University in Sweden and associate professor.

“Paint tau-217 blood concentrations rise significantly in Alzheimer’s disease patients. In comparison to senior people without Alzheimer’s disease, levels are more than eight times higher in the dementia stage of the disease, according to an email from Palmqvist.

A related test called p-tau217 is up to 96% accurate in detecting high levels of beta-amyloid and up to 97% accurate in identifying tau, according to research published in January. The brain’s beta-amyloid and tau tangles are characteristic indicators of Alzheimer’s disease.

The p-tau217 test was used in the latest study in conjunction with the amyloid 42/40 ratio, a blood biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease that detects two different forms of amyloid proteins.

The most predictive was the amyloid likelihood score, which was derived from the combination of the tau and amyloid tests.

The Alzheimer’s Association’s chief science officer, Dr. Maria Carrillo, stated, “We’d love to have a blood test that can be used in a primary care physician’s office, functioning like a cholesterol test but for Alzheimer’s.”

“The p-tau217 blood test is turning out to be the most specific for Alzheimer’s and the one with the most validity. It seems to be the front-runner,” according to Carrillo, the association’s research project coordinator, who also provided some funds for the recent study.

High-accuracy blood tests have the potential to “change the game in the speed at which we can conduct Alzheimer’s trials and get to the next new medication,” she said, once they have undergone thorough testing.“These are absolutely transformational times.”

How does a blood test for p-tau217 operate?

According to Carrillo, p-tau217 is a unique peptide that is only seen in the brain when amyloid plaques are present.

“What that means to us scientifically is that when we’re measuring p-tau217, we’re measuring the neuronal damage from tau very early on in Alzheimer’s, but only when amyloid is already present,” the speaker explained.

“You’re not really measuring amyloid, but the test is telling you it’s there, and that’s been backed up with objective PET (positron emission tomography) scans that can see amyloid in the brain,” explained Carrillo. “It’s a beautiful marker for Alzheimer’s: If you don’t have amyloid present, you don’t have Alzheimer’s. If you have elevated tau in your brain, however, then we know that’s a sign of another type of dementia.”

Frontal lobe dementia, or FTD, is one of the neurological conditions that tau tangles have been linked to. The frontal lobe of the brain is attacked by tau tangles in frontal lobe dementia (FTD), which results in behavioral, affective, and executive function loss, including planning. If memory loss develops, it does so considerably later.

Although amyloid plaques are a major factor, tau tangles accumulate in the area of the brain that controls memory in Alzheimer’s disease. At synapses, tiny clusters of plaques can form and obstruct communication between nerve cells. Additionally, amyloid plaques have the potential to overstimulate the immune system, resulting in inflammation and additional brain injury.

Experts believe that some of the newest medications for dementia, such lecanemab and donanemab, which target beta-amyloid, are less effective in patients with extensive tau pathology.

Even in people in their 30s or 40s, deposits of amyloid can start to build up in the brain decades before symptoms appear, so early detection of brain amyloid may be essential for preventive pharmaceutical treatment and lifestyle changes.

The screening tests used now are not conclusive

The research, which was released on Sunday in the journal JAMA Neurology, tracked 1,213 subjects in Sweden who were having cognitive assessments performed in primary care and specialized clinics. The subjects’ average age was 74.

A final score was calculated by combining blood measurements of beta-amyloid 40/42 with the findings of each individual’s p-tau217 test.

“When you use a combination of the 40 to 42 ratio and p-tau217, it increases the diagnostic accuracy of p-tau217,” stated Dr. Richard Isaacson, director of research at the Institute for Neurodegenerative Diseases in Florida and preventive neurologist, who was not involved in the study.

A spinal fluid tap was used to verify the study’s combined blood test’s 90% accuracy. This test, together with an amyloid PET scan, is presently the only gold-standard scientific approach for detecting Alzheimer’s disease outside of autopsy. Experts claim that both tests are pricy, intrusive, and not easily accessible across the United States.

Following that, the blood test results were compared to the patient diagnoses given by Swedish primary care physicians and specialists. The comparatively low accuracy rates (61% and 73%) demonstrate how challenging it is for medical professionals to diagnose Alzheimer’s pathology accurately using the current diagnostic methods, which include a quick cognitive test, a brief patient interview, and a computed tomography, or CT, scan of the brain.

“Generally, both traditional paper-and-pen tests and digital cognitive assessments are not highly accurate in specifically identifying Alzheimer’s disease,” according to research coauthor Dr. Oskar Hansson, a senior consultant in neurology at Lund University and professor.

In an email, Hansson stated, “Many other conditions and diseases can present similar cognitive symptoms, leading to potential misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis.”

According to Hansson, between 20% and 30% of people who consult specialists have other medical issues or are on drugs that can mimic Alzheimer’s disease. Conditions including vascular dementia, depression, thyroid issues, sleep apnea, and even a vitamin B12 deficiency can all have an impact on cognitive performance.

People without Alzheimer’s pathology may backlog appointments for spinal taps and amyloid PET scans as well as specialist waiting lists if those mimics are missed during the initial assessment, according to Carrillo.

She continued by saying that a person with real amyloid pathology can “fall out of that window of being eligible for the drugs we have, and that’s terrible” by the time they see a specialist.

When will it be possible to get regular blood tests?

However, the study revealed that wait times may decrease to six to thirteen months if correct blood tests were employed, as fewer people would require follow-up testing or consultation with specialists.

It is unlikely that routine blood testing for Alzheimer’s will soon be available at the office of your primary care physician.

However, don’t anticipate seeing routine blood tests for Alzheimer’s in the office of your general care physician anytime soon. According to Isaacson, more study is required to confirm the encouraging findings seen in studies, recommendations for physician use need to be created and disseminated, and doctors need to be informed about any potential subtleties.

He stated, “There’s no one more bullish on these tests than I am, but Alzheimer’s blood tests aren’t fully definitive yet,” “If it is a positive test, it still needs to be confirmed via PET scan or spinal tap. If it’s a negative result, that’s reassuring, but if it’s borderline, we still don’t know what that means.”

A Mediterranean-style diet, frequent exercise, and managing vascular risk factors like high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and diabetes are just a few of the steps people can take to avoid or delay cognitive impairment in the interim.

“It’s our goal to use only the highest-quality blood tests to not only help make an early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s but also evaluate response to risk-reducing interventions,” Isaacson stated. “These are very hopeful times.”

Health

Fruits High in Protein: A Surprising Nutritional Boost

Published

on

Fruits High in Protein: A Surprising Nutritional Boost

When thinking of protein sources, fruits might not top the list. However, certain fruits can contribute a surprising amount of this essential macronutrient. While they can’t replace traditional high-protein foods like beans, legumes, or meats, these fruits provide a valuable combination of protein, fiber, vitamins, and antioxidants. Here’s a closer look at protein-rich fruits and their nutritional benefits.

Why is Protein Important?

Protein plays a crucial role in maintaining satiety, tissue repair, and muscle growth. High-protein diets are widely known for aiding weight loss and supporting a healthy lifestyle. Recently, plant-based diets have gained attention for their weight loss benefits and overall health advantages.

Registered dietitian Natalie Rizzo emphasizes that fruit protein should be seen as an addition rather than a primary source. “Every gram of protein counts, especially in a plant-forward diet,” she says. Most people need at least 20 grams of protein per meal, and fruits can be a small yet beneficial contributor.

Protein-Rich Fruits

Here are some fruits that stand out for their protein content, with each providing 1 gram or more per serving.

Passion Fruit

  • Protein: 5 grams per cup of raw fruit
  • Known for its aromatic, jelly-like golden pulp, passion fruit is also rich in fiber, calcium, and vitamins A and C. It can be eaten raw, added to yogurt, or blended into drinks.

Jackfruit

  • Protein: 2.8 grams per cup of raw slices
  • A relative of figs and breadfruit, jackfruit can be eaten ripe as a sweet fruit or unripe as a meat alternative in plant-based dishes.

Pomegranate

  • Protein: 2.9 grams per cup of arils (seeds)
  • Pomegranate seeds are packed with antioxidants, dietary fiber, and anti-inflammatory fatty acids beneficial for heart health.

Apricots

  • Protein: 2.3 grams per cup of fresh slices; 4.4 grams per cup of dried halves
  • This fiber-rich stone fruit also provides antioxidants, iron, and vitamins C, E, B6, and A. Fresh or dried, apricots are a delicious and nutritious snack.

Blackberries

  • Protein: 2 grams per cup of raw fruit
  • Blackberries are rich in antioxidants that may reduce cancer risk and improve gut health due to their high fiber content.

Guava

  • Protein: 1.4 grams per fruit
  • This tropical fruit offers antioxidants, vitamin C, potassium, and fiber. Its sweet-tart flavor makes it versatile for eating raw, blending into smoothies, or making jams.

Raisins

  • Protein: 1.4 grams per 1.5-ounce box
  • Raisins are small but mighty, offering fiber, potassium, and heart health benefits. They make a convenient and nutrient-dense snack, but portion control is key due to their calorie content.

Citrus Fruits

  • Protein: 1.2 grams per orange; 2.3 grams per grapefruit
  • Famous for their vitamin C content, oranges and grapefruits also deliver fiber, potassium, and hydration while being low in calories.

Cantaloupe

  • Protein: 1.3 grams per cup of cubed fruit
  • A standout for its high vitamin A content, cantaloupe provides 40% of the daily recommended intake per cup. It’s an excellent addition to fruit salads, smoothies, or desserts.

Incorporating Fruits Into a Protein-Rich Diet

While fruits shouldn’t be relied on as a primary protein source, they can complement a balanced diet rich in beans, nuts, seeds, and other plant-based proteins. Their added benefits—like vitamins, antioxidants, and fiber—make them a healthy, versatile choice.

Whether you’re blending blackberries into a smoothie, topping yogurt with passion fruit pulp, or snacking on a handful of raisins, these protein-rich fruits are a simple way to enhance your diet while satisfying your sweet tooth.

Continue Reading

Health

Coffee and Tea Drinking May Reduce the Risk of Some Cancers: Research

Published

on

Drinking a cup of Joe or some tea for the holidays may be a good thing!

A study reviewed in the journal of the American Cancer Society found that people who drink either tea or coffee have a slightly lower risk of head and neck cancers, though it remains unclear if the drinks themselves directly reduce the risk.

Researchers analyzed data from 14 individual studies involving over 9,500 people with head and neck cancers and over 15,000 people without, compiled by the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium.

The findings showed that individuals who drank less than four cups of caffeinated coffee daily and less than a cup of tea had a 17% and 9% lower chance, respectively, of developing head or neck cancer overall.

The study also highlighted that coffee drinkers had a reduced risk of developing oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers located in the middle part of the throat, according to Yale Medicine. Meanwhile, tea drinkers who consumed less than a cup daily showed a lower risk of hypopharyngeal cancer, which affects the bottom part of the throat, per Johns Hopkins Medicine.

“While there has been prior research on coffee and tea consumption and reduced risk of cancer, this study highlighted their varying effects with different sub-sites of head and neck cancer, including the observation that even decaffeinated coffee had some positive impact,” said Dr. Yuan-Chin Amy Lee, senior author of the study from Huntsman Cancer Institute and the University of Utah School of Medicine, as reported by The Guardian.

“Perhaps bioactive compounds other than caffeine contribute to the potential anti-cancer effect of coffee and tea,” Lee added.

However, drinking more than one cup of tea daily was linked to a higher risk of laryngeal cancer, which forms in the larynx, the part of the throat responsible for controlling the vocal cords, according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

The study also acknowledged limitations, as participants self-reported their findings and were not asked about the specific types of tea or coffee consumed. Additional unaccounted factors may have influenced the results as well.

“In observational studies, it is very difficult to totally eliminate confounding effects, for example, of tobacco and alcohol from the statistical analysis,” Tom Sanders, a professor emeritus of nutrition and dietetics at King’s College London, told The Guardian.

“Consequently, people who drink a lot of coffee and tea may be more likely to avoid other harmful behaviors such as drinking alcohol and using tobacco and so may be at a lower risk of these cancers for other reasons,” added Sanders, who was not involved in the study.

Continue Reading

Health

How the brain makes complex judgments based on context

Published

on

We frequently face difficult choices in life that are impacted by a number of variables. The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the dorsal hippocampus (DH) are two key brain regions that are essential for our capacity to adjust and make sense of these unclear situations.

According to research conducted by researchers at the University of California Santa Barbara (UCSB), these regions work together to resolve ambiguity and facilitate quick learning.

Decision-making that depends on context

The results, which were released in the journal Current Biology, offer fresh perspectives on how certain brain regions assist us in navigating situations that depend on context and modifying our behavior accordingly.

According to UCSB neuroscientist Ron Keiflin, senior author, “I would argue that that’s the foundation of cognition.” That’s what prevents us from acting like mindless machines that react to stimuli in the same way every time.

“Our ability to understand that the meaning of certain stimuli is context-dependent is what gives us flexibility; it is what allows us to act in a situation-appropriate manner.”

Decision-making context

Think about choosing whether or not to answer a ringing phone. What you say depends on a number of variables, including the time of day, who might be calling, and where you are.

The “context,” which influences your choice, is made up of several components. The interaction between the OFC and DH is what gives rise to this cognitive flexibility, according to Keiflin.

Planning, reward valuation, and decision-making are linked to the OFC, which is situated directly above the eyes, whereas memory and spatial navigation depend on the DH, which is positioned deeper in the brain.

According to Keiflin, both areas contribute to a mental representation of the causal structure of the environment, or a “cognitive map.” The brain can model outcomes, forecast outcomes, and direct behavior thanks to this map.

Despite their significance, up until now there had been no systematic testing of the precise functions of these regions in contextual disambiguation, which determines how stimuli alter meaning based on context.

Contextualizing auditory stimuli

In order to find out, the researchers created an experiment in which rats were exposed to aural cues in two distinct settings: a room with bright lighting and a chamber with no light. There was a context-dependent meaning for every sound.

For instance, one sound indicated a reward (sugar water) only when it was light, and another only when it was dark.

The rats eventually learnt to link each sound to the appropriate context, and in one situation they showed that they understood by licking the reward cup in anticipation of a treat, but not in the other.

The OFC or DH was then momentarily disabled during the task by the researchers using chemogenetics. The rats’ ability to use context to predict rewards and control their behavior was lost when the OFC was turned off.

Disabling the DH, however, had minimal effect on performance, which was unexpected considering its well-established function in memory and spatial processing.

Enhanced learning from prior knowledge

For learning new context-dependent interactions, the DH proved essential, but it appeared to be unnecessary for recalling previously learned ones.

“If I walked into an advanced math lecture, I would understand – and learn – very little. But someone more mathematically knowledgeable would be able to understand the material, which would greatly facilitate learning,” Keiflin explained.

Additionally, the rats were able to pick up new relationships far more quickly after they had created a “cognitive map” of context-dependent interactions. The duration of training decreased from more than four months to a few days.

Brain areas cooperating

By employing the same chemogenetic strategy, the researchers discovered that the rats’ capacity to use past information to discover new associations was hampered when the OFC or DH were disabled.

While the DH allowed for the quick learning of novel context-dependent relationships, the OFC was crucial for using contextual knowledge to control immediate action.

This dual role emphasizes how these brain regions assist learning and decision-making in complementary ways.

Education and neuroscience Implications

According to Keiflin, neuroscience research frequently overlooks the well-established psychological and educational theories that prior information affects learning.

Knowing how the brain leverages past information to support learning could help develop educational plans and therapies for people who struggle with learning.

The study clarifies the different functions of the DH and OFC as well. In order to acquire new relationships, the DH is more important than the OFC, which aids in behavior regulation based on contextual knowledge.

These areas work together to help the brain adjust to complicated, dynamic surroundings.

Brain’s Capacity to make Decisions based on context

The study emphasizes how crucial contextual knowledge is for managing day-to-day existence. Human cognition is based on the brain’s capacity to resolve ambiguity, whether it be while choosing whether to answer a ringing phone or when adjusting to new knowledge.

This work highlights the complex processes that facilitate learning and decision-making while also advancing our knowledge of brain function by elucidating the functions of the OFC and DH.

This information creates opportunities to investigate the potential roles that disturbances in these systems may play in disorders like anxiety or problems with decision-making.

Since this type of learning is most likely far more reflective of the human learning experience, Keiflin stated that “a better neurobiological understanding of this rapid learning and inference of context-dependent relations is critical, as this form of learning is probably much more representative of the human learning experience.” 

The results open the door for future studies on the interactions between these brain areas in challenging, real-world situations, which could have implications for mental health and education.

Continue Reading

Trending

error: Content is protected !!