Connect with us

Entertainment

Leo review: An action drama with some interesting elements

Published

on

Box workplace emperor Thalapathy Vijay joined forces with sensational filmmaker Lokesh Kanagaraj for the motion drama, Leo. The movie has been making noise proper given that its announcement, and its hype reached exceptional tiers now. The boost bookings have indicated that Leo will create a pandemonium at the ticket windows. Let’s see if this much-hyped movie lived up to the expectations or not.

Parthiban (Thalapathy Vijay) runs a cafe in Theog, Himachal Pradesh. He is a everyday household man who lives with his spouse Satya (Trisha) and two children. One day a few goons assault Parthiban’s cafe and they threaten to kill his daughter and a employee there. With no choice left, Parthiban kills the gangsters, which lands his household in trouble. When Parthiban is going thru all this fuss, gangsters Antony Das (Sanjay Dutt) and Harold Das (Arjun) come into his life, and they agree with Parthiban is their household member, Leo Das (Thalapathy Vijay). Who precisely is this Leo Das? What passed off to him? How did Parthiban manipulate to get out of all this turmoil? This is what the relaxation of the movie is about

The film’s first half of is noticeably an awful lot engaging. The tempo is deliberately saved gradual here. The hyena scene and the follow-up household drama take us into the world of Parthiban. There is actually no rush in the proceedings. The intention used to be to set up the characters and the protagonist’s world in a neat manner. The film reaches its height at some point of the cafe combat scene.

Vijay’s vulnerability is properly depicted and as a result the motion blocks (first hour) supply a last high. Vijay is no longer simply a star, however he is a excellent actor too. Leo exactly showcases the performing brilliance of Thalapathy Vijay. Fight scenes in the first half of are properly staged, and Vijay’s performance, coupled with well-crafted motion blocks, continues the lawsuits engaging.

The interval block is decent, and it units up matters properly for the 2d half. Leo has some brilliant motion blocks and strong cinematography. Trisha is great in her role. The film choices up tempo in the pre-climax and climax portions. Yes, the movie is a section of LCU, and the franchise followers have a few moments to cheer about. There is a small shock in the end.

The 2d half of is continually the key as it decides the film’s range. But most of the motion pictures of late are going via this second-hour syndrome. Unfortunately, Leo additionally falls in the equal category. What’s without a doubt stunning is the way the flashback parts are written. One wouldn’t anticipate such light writing from any one like Lokesh Kanagaraj, who delivered brilliant films.

The pacing is once more sluggish publish the interval mark, with nothing an awful lot occurring storywise. But a few moments hold the complaints going till the graduation of the flashback portion, which brings down the movie. Due to the terrible writing, Sanjay Dutt and Arjun don’t make a lot impact. As said, the writing branch desires to be blamed here.

Actors like Priya Anand don’t have something to do in the movie. A key character, which a stated actress performs in the 2d half, is poorly designed. The supposed emotional scenes lack punch. Telugu dubbing is fine, however the Naa Ready track is a large letdown. A Tamil tune performs in the heritage throughout the cafe combat scene. It would have been higher had the makers used some Telugu music right here for the Telugu version. The minute detailing elements like necessary paper cuttings, and count engraved on a photograph body have been in Tamil. These small important points additionally do make a difference.

Anirudh’s heritage rating is top in parts. However it is now not that outstanding when in contrast to his satisfactory works like Master and Vikram. The songs, too, didn’t go away a mark, which used to be due to horrific translation. The cinematography by way of Manoj Paramahamsa is stupendous. There is an motion block in the flashback sequence, and the digital camera motion was once terrific here. The modifying is below-par in the 2nd half, whilst it is exact in the first hour. The VFX used to be right in the hyena scene. When it comes to the automobile chase sequence, the VFX works are under par as the complete element appears cartoonish.

Coming to the director, Lokesh Kanagaraj, he did simply an k job with Leo. Lokesh treated the first 1/2 neatly, however he couldn’t raise the equal momentum in the 2d half. There is no doubt that we have viewed this story more than one times, however what things the most is how it is told. Lokesh has set the bar excessive with his films, however he couldn’t surpass the expectations totally with Leo, and he grants simply an ok product.

On the whole, Leo is an motion entertainer that depends majorly on the overall performance of Thalapathy Vijay. The first 1/2 is attractive notwithstanding the gradual pacing, however the movie runs into bother as soon as the 2nd half of starts. The flashback parts and poorly designed characters are the predominant drawbacks. Leo is a phase of the LCU, and there are a few moments for the franchise followers to cherish. Lokesh Kanagaraj’s magic is relatively lacking in Leo, and the container workplace potentialities of the movie rely on the stardom of Vijay and the LCU factor.

Entertainment

Danny Ramirez on Joaquin Phoenix Leaving the Gay Romance Film Directed by Todd Haynes

Published

on

Todd Haynes was planning to cast Danny Ramirez and Joaquin Phoenix in a gay romance movie. However, Phoenix left the untitled production five days before Guadalajara, Mexico, filming got underway.

At the Academy Museum Gala on Saturday night in Los Angeles, Ramirez told Variety’s Marc Malkin, “It’s definitely disappointing.” “If anything,” he continued, “If anything, it just gave me more inspiration to keep driving, keep pushing, and knowing that I’m on the right path and approaching the work the right way. So that’s what I’m excited about.”

The movie, which depended on Phoenix’s casting, was in danger after it was revealed in August that he had quit the production, according to sources. Two guys in love in the 1930s who escape Los Angeles and travel to Mexico were the main subject of the NC-17-rated movie.

“It’s definitely a very complicated situation,” Ramirez stated. “The audition process was extensive, and so what I walked away with that was just the artistic validation of throwing down opposite of [Phoenix] in this chemistry read… There was a moment that I was like, ‘Oh, I’ve arrived as a performer.’”

“The most recent update is ‘hopefully.’” Ramirez said in response to a question about whether the movie is still in development with filmmaker Haynes.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

David Schwimmer Remembers Rejecting “Men in Black”: ‘That Would Have Made Me a Hollywood Star’

Published

on

Although David Schwimmer admits his “career would have taken a very different trajectory” if he had been the lead in the 1997 movie, he doesn’t regret declining Men in Black.

The actor said, “That’s not why I turned it down,” in response to a question on a recent episode of the podcast Origins With Cush Jumbo regarding whether he rejected down the successful franchise because it conflicted with his Friends filming schedule. Rather, he decided to become a feature film director.

Schwimmer said, “[It] was a brutal decision.” the actor chuckles. “I had just finished filming The Pallbearer, my first film with Gwyneth Paltrow, and there were high expectations of that, which didn’t come true (Laughs). It was kind of a bomb, but there were high expectations, and the studio, which was Miramax, wanted to lock me into a three-picture deal at a fixed price, and I said I would do that if I got to direct my first movie.”

After months of talks, the intelligence actor said that they had come to an agreement whereby he “would act in three more movies for them” in exchange for allowing him to “direct my entire theater company in the first film,” Since You’ve Been Gone from 1998. The film was told through the perspective of a doctor who was severely beaten up by a fellow graduate on graduation day, humiliating him and setting the stage for a ten-year class reunion.

“All these unknown actors but I was going to put them on the map, basically. I was going to let everyone discover the talent of this amazing company,” Schwimmer said, “We found this amazing script, and we were developing it. We started pre-production. All my best friends in the world in my theater company quit their jobs so they could be in this film over the summer, which was going to be a six-week shoot in Chicago.”

However, Schwimmer had to make a tough decision about his career because the production for his directing debut happened to coincide with the filming of Men in Black.

The Six Days Seven Nights actor recalls, “We’re in pre-production, hired the whole crew, everything’s going and that’s when I was offered Men in Black.” “It was a direct conflict with this. My summer window from Friends was four months. I had a four-month hiatus and Men in Black was going to shoot exactly when I was going to direct this film with my company. And of course, it was an amazing opportunity. However, my theater company and that relationship with all those people would probably have ended. I don’t think it would have recovered.”

Schwimmer stated that he is unsure if “he made the right choice,” but he firmly feels that in these kinds of circumstances “you have to follow your gut, you have to follow your heart.”

“Look, I’m really aware, whatever 20 years later maybe more, [Men in Black] would have made me a movie star,” he continued. “If you look at the success of that film and that franchise, my career would have taken a very different trajectory.”

In the end, Tommy Lee Jones and Will Smith played the key parts in the Men in Black franchise.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

The Role of Vulnerability in Success: Hannah Love’s Guide to Embracing Your True Self

Published

on

In a world that often celebrates strength and success, vulnerability might seem like a weakness—but for Hannah Love, it’s a cornerstone of true personal growth and success. Throughout her journey, Hannah has discovered that embracing vulnerability isn’t just about being open with others; it’s about being honest with yourself. It’s through this honesty that real transformation begins.

Hannah’s life has been shaped by challenges that tested her resilience and forced her to confront deep-seated fears and insecurities. From childhood trauma to the emotional struggles of her twenties, she faced moments where vulnerability was not an option but a necessity. “For a long time, I saw vulnerability as a sign of weakness,” Hannah recalls. “I thought that if I let people see my pain, they would see me as less capable, less strong.”

However, as Hannah began to open up about her experiences, she realized that vulnerability was not her enemy—it was her greatest ally. It allowed her to connect with others on a deeper level, to share her struggles without shame, and to find strength in the very parts of herself that she had once tried to hide. “Vulnerability isn’t about being weak,” she explains. “It’s about being real. It’s about showing up as your true self, no matter how imperfect that self might be.”

One of the most significant lessons Hannah learned is that vulnerability is essential to building meaningful relationships. When we allow ourselves to be vulnerable, we create space for others to do the same. This mutual openness fosters trust and deepens connections, both personally and professionally. “The more I shared my story, the more I realized that others were going through similar struggles,” Hannah says. “By being vulnerable, I wasn’t just helping myself—I was helping others feel less alone.”

In her work as a mental health advocate, Hannah emphasizes the power of vulnerability in healing and personal development. She encourages others to embrace their imperfections, to share their stories, and to see vulnerability as a pathway to growth rather than a hurdle to overcome. “When we hide our true selves, we limit our potential,” she explains. “But when we embrace who we are, flaws and all, we open ourselves up to new possibilities.”

Hannah’s journey also taught her that vulnerability is closely linked to authenticity. For years, she tried to fit into societal molds, hiding her true feelings behind a mask of perfection. But this only led to more pain and disconnection. It was only when she started living authentically—when she stopped trying to be what others expected and started being herself—that she found true success. “Living authentically means embracing your vulnerabilities and showing up as your whole self,” she says. “It’s about being honest with yourself and others, even when it’s hard.”

Through her platform, Hannah continues to advocate for vulnerability as a key to personal and professional success. She believes that when we embrace our vulnerabilities, we not only empower ourselves but also inspire others to do the same. “Success isn’t just about what you achieve,” she explains. “It’s about how you achieve it—by being true to yourself and allowing others to see the real you.”

As Hannah prepares for her TEDx Miami talk, she is eager to share her insights on vulnerability and authenticity with a broader audience. She hopes to inspire others to embrace their true selves and to see vulnerability not as a weakness, but as a source of strength and connection. Her message is clear: in a world that often values perfection, it’s our imperfections—and our willingness to share them—that truly make us successful.

Continue Reading

Trending

error: Content is protected !!