Connect with us

Technology

When it Comes To Creative Thinking, AI Excels Above Humans

Published

on

When it Comes To Creative Thinking, AI Excels Above Humans

In three divergent thinking tests, ChatGPT-4 was compared against 151 human participants. The results showed that the AI was more creative. The tests, which evaluated the capacity to come up with original replies, revealed that GPT-4 was able to provide more creative and detailed responses.

While acknowledging the limitations of AI’s agency and the difficulties in evaluating creativity, the study highlights the growing potential of AI in creative fields. Even though AI has the potential to be a tool for boosting human creativity, concerns concerning its function and possible integration with creative processes still exist.

Important Details:

The Creative Edge of AI

In activities involving divergent thinking, ChatGPT-4 fared better than human participants, exhibiting superior originality and elaboration in responses.

Notes on the Study:

Researchers point out that despite AI’s remarkable abilities, it lacks agency and that human contact is necessary to unleash its creative potential.

AI’s Place in Creative Futures:

The results imply that AI might be a motivating instrument that supports human creativity and helps it overcome conceptual rigidity, but it’s still unclear how much AI can actually replace human innovation.

The ability to come up with a novel answer to a question without a predetermined one, like “What is the best way to avoid talking about politics with my parents?” is a hallmark of divergent thinking. GPT-4 gave more thoughtful and unique responses to the study than did the human participants.

The authors of the study, “The current state of artificial intelligence generative language models is more creative than humans on divergent thinking tasks,” are Kim N. Awa and Kent F. Hubert, Ph.D. candidates in psychological science at the University of Arizona, and Darya L. Zabelina, an assistant professor of psychology science and the head of the Mechanisms of Creative Cognition and Attention Lab. The study was published in Scientific Reports.

Three tests were used: the Consequences Task, which asks participants to imagine possible outcomes of hypothetical situations, such as “what if humans no longer needed sleep?”; the Divergent Associations Task, which asks participants to generate 10 nouns that are as semantically distant as possible; and the Alternative Use Task, which asks participants to come up with creative uses for everyday objects like a rope or a fork. For example, there is very little semantic difference between the words “dog” and “cat,” but a lot between words like “cat” and “ontology.”

Response length, quantity, and semantic variation across words were all taken into consideration while evaluating the answers. In the end, the researchers concluded that even after adjusting for answer fluency, GPT-4 outperformed humans overall on all of the divergent thinking tasks in terms of originality and elaborateness. Stated differently, GPT-4 showed greater creative potential on a battery of activities involving divergent thinking.

There are certain limitations to this discovery. As the authors put it, “It is important to note that the measures used in this study are all measures of creative potential, but another aspect of measuring a person’s creativity is their involvement in creative activities or achievements.”

The aim of the research was to investigate creative potential at the human level, rather than focusing on individuals who may possess formal creative qualifications.

Hubert and Awa go on to say that AI is “dependent on the assistance of a human user” and “does not have agency, unlike humans.” As a result, until something prompts it, AI’s creative potential remains untapped.

Furthermore, the suitability of the GPT-4 replies was not assessed by the researchers. As a result, even if the AI might have responded more often and creatively, the human participants might have felt limited by the requirement that their answers be based on reality.

While acknowledging that there may not have been much human reason to compose lengthy responses, Awa added that there are still unanswered problems regarding “how do you operationalize creativity? Is it truly true that the results of these tests on humans may be applied to other individuals? Is a wide range of innovative ideas being evaluated? Therefore, I believe it requires us to critically evaluate the most widely used metrics for divergent thinking.

It’s not really important whether the tests accurately reflect the creative capacity of people. The key point is that big language models are developing at a breakneck pace, surpassing human performance in previously unheard-of ways. It remains to be seen if they pose a threat to human ingenuity.

“Moving forward, future possibilities of AI acting as a tool of inspiration, as an aid in a person’s creative process or to overcome fixedness is promising,” the authors continue to believe for the time being.

Technology

Threads uses a more sophisticated search to compete with Bluesky

Published

on

Instagram Threads, a rival to Meta’s X, will have an enhanced search experience, the firm said Monday. The app, which is based on Instagram’s social graph and provides a Meta-run substitute for Elon Musk’s X, is introducing a new feature that lets users search for certain posts by date ranges and user profiles.

Compared to X’s advanced search, which now allows users to refine queries by language, keywords, exact phrases, excluded terms, hashtags, and more, this is less thorough. However, it does make it simpler for users of Threads to find particular messages. Additionally, it will make Threads’ search more comparable to Bluesky’s, which also lets users use sophisticated queries to restrict searches by user profiles, date ranges, and other criteria. However, not all of the filtering options are yet visible in the Bluesky app’s user interface.

In order to counter the danger posed by social networking startup Bluesky, which has quickly gained traction as another X competitor, Meta has started launching new features in quick succession in recent days. Bluesky had more than 9 million users in September, but in the weeks after the U.S. elections, users left X due to Elon Musk’s political views and other policy changes, including plans to alter the way blocks operate and let AI companies train on X user data. According to Bluesky, there are currently around 24 million users.

Meta’s Threads introduced new features to counter Bluesky’s potential, such as an improved algorithm, a design modification that makes switching between feeds easier, and the option for users to select their own default feed. Additionally, it was observed creating Starter Packs, its own version of Bluesky’s user-curated recommendation lists.

Continue Reading

Technology

Apple’s own 5G modem-equipped iPhone SE 4 is “confirmed” to launch in March

Published

on

Tom O’Malley, an analyst at Barclays, recently visited Asia with his colleagues to speak with suppliers and makers of electronics. The analysts said they had “confirmed” that a fourth-generation iPhone SE with an Apple-designed 5G modem is scheduled to launch near the end of the first quarter next year in a research note they released this week that outlines the main conclusions from the trip. That timeline implies that the next iPhone SE will be unveiled in March, similar to when the present model was unveiled in 2022, in keeping with earlier rumors.

The rumored features of the fourth-generation iPhone SE include a 6.1-inch OLED display, Face ID, a newer A-series chip, a USB-C port, a single 48-megapixel rear camera, 8GB of RAM to enable Apple Intelligence support, and the previously mentioned Apple-designed 5G modem. The SE is anticipated to have a similar design to the base iPhone 14.

Since 2018, Apple is said to have been developing its own 5G modem for iPhones, a move that will let it lessen and eventually do away with its reliance on Qualcomm. With Qualcomm’s 5G modem supply arrangement for iPhone launches extended through 2026 earlier this year, Apple still has plenty of time to finish switching to its own modem. In addition to the fourth-generation iPhone SE, Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo earlier stated that the so-called “iPhone 17 Air” would come with a 5G modem that was created by Apple.

Whether Apple’s initial 5G modem would offer any advantages to consumers over Qualcomm’s modems, such quicker speeds, is uncertain.

Qualcomm was sued by Apple in 2017 for anticompetitive behavior and $1 billion in unpaid royalties. In 2019, Apple purchased the majority of Intel’s smartphone modem business after the two firms reached a settlement in the dispute. Apple was able to support its development by acquiring a portfolio of patents relating to cellular technology. It appears that we will eventually be able to enjoy the results of our effort in four more months.

On March 8, 2022, Apple made the announcement of the third-generation iPhone SE online. With antiquated features like a Touch ID button, a Lightning port, and large bezels surrounding the screen, the handset resembles the iPhone 8. The iPhone SE presently retails for $429 in the United States, but the new model may see a price increase of at least a little.

Continue Reading

Technology

Google is said to be discontinuing the Pixel Tablet 2 and may be leaving the market once more

Published

on

Google terminated the development of the Pixel Tablet 3 yesterday, according to Android Headlines, even before a second-generation model was announced. The second-generation Pixel Tablet has actually been canceled, according to the report. This means that the gadget that was released last year will likely be a one-off, and Google is abandoning the tablet market for the second time in just over five years.

If accurate, the report indicates that Google has determined that it is not worth investing more money in a follow-up because of the dismal sales of the Pixel Tablet. Rumors of a keyboard accessory and more functionality for the now-defunct project surfaced as recently as last week.

It’s important to keep in mind that Google’s Nest subsidiary may abandon its plans for large-screen products in favor of developing technologies like the Nest Hub and Hub Max rather than standalone tablets.

Google has always had difficulty making a significant impact in the tablet market and creating a competitor that can match Apple’s iPad in terms of sales and general performance, not helped in the least by its inconsistent approach. Even though the hardware was good, it never really fought back after getting off to a promising start with the Nexus 7 eons ago. Another problem that has hampered Google’s efforts is that Android significantly trails iPadOS in terms of the quantity of third-party apps that are tablet-optimized.

After the Pixel Slate received tremendously unfavorable reviews, the firm first declared that it was finished producing tablets in 2019. Two tablets that were still in development at the time were discarded.

By 2022, however, Google had altered its mind and declared that a tablet was being developed by its Pixel hardware team. The $499 Pixel Tablet was the final version of the gadget, which came with a speaker dock that the tablet could magnetically connect to. (Google would subsequently charge $399 for the tablet alone.)

Continue Reading

Trending

error: Content is protected !!